IO5A4758 copy-pig faces-organic-Helen's Farm-noexpiry-credit Jason Taylor (25).JPG

The UK may soon finally ban routine farm antibiotic use

The UK may soon finally ban routine farm antibiotic use

New government proposals are being put forward for ending routine preventative antibiotic use in farming.

If adopted, the new rules will be a major step forward towards more responsible farm antibiotic use and a significant achievement for a longstanding Soil Association campaign being run with partner organisations, Compassion in World Farming and Sustain.

Crucially, the new rules are also expected to ban using antibiotics “to compensate for poor hygiene, inadequate animal husbandry, or poor farm management practices”. If implemented properly, this restriction should lead to significant change in husbandry methods, since some current practices of intensive farming result in poor hygiene, higher levels of stress and disease and reliance on excessive antibiotic use. It’s imperative therefore that this restriction is complied with in practice, as well as included in legislation.

Decades of campaigning for the end of antibiotic misuse in farming

We started campaigning to end the misuse of antibiotics in farming back in the 1990s. Some scientists had begun raising the alarm about antibiotic resistance – the idea that the more antibiotics are used, the sooner they lose their ability to treat disease. We wanted to further raise awareness about the issue in intensive farming. The European Union was considering banning the use of antibiotics as growth promoters. Our campaign supported this move but called for routine preventative antibiotic use to also be prohibited.

The reasons why action on preventative antibiotic use was essential were clear: Our first major antibiotics campaign report, published in 1998, found that the use of certain antibiotics had massively increased since they had been banned as growth promoters in the 1970s. This had happened because many farmers had simply increased their use of the antibiotics for prevention to replace the banned growth-promoting use, knowing that they would also obtain a growth-promoting effect since the substances were the same.

Without action on preventative use, antibiotic misuse and the shift towards more intensive livestock production would continue, since it was routine antibiotic use that enabled so many animals to be kept in cramped, stressful and unhygienic conditions. The spread of antibiotic resistance from farms would also continue. Our next report showed how the excessive farm use of antibiotics could enable the spread of antibiotic resistance through the food chain.

Despite our protestations, the EU decided to only focus on antibiotic growth promotion, banning it in 2006, but allowing other forms of routine use to continue. New types of resistant bacteria, like highly resistant Ecoli or MRSA, continued to emerge in farm animals, and posed a threat to humans.

In 2009, the Soil Association co-founded the Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics, with Compassion in World Farming and Sustain, to further the campaign to end all forms of routine farm antibiotic use and to improve husbandry methods so that animals are almost always healthy enough not to need antibiotics or other forms of routine medication. Over 70 medical, environmental and animal-welfare organisations have now signed up to support the campaign.

The Alliance, in turn, in 2014, helped co-found the Antibiotic Resistance Coalition (ARC), a global coalition of civil-society organisations working to promote more responsible antibiotic use in human medicine and in farming. As an active member of the ARC, the Alliance was able to build relationships with organisations internationally that were also working to end routine farm antibiotic use.

pigs out in the open

EU finally takes action on routine preventative use and preventative group treatments

In 2014, the European Commission put forward new proposals to restrict farm antibiotic use as, by then, data showed that the ban on antibiotic growth promoters had not significantly reduced antibiotic use in many Member States, and antibiotic resistance was becoming an ever-greater problem. The Commission’s proposals contained loopholes, which would have allowed routine use to continue, so the European Parliament decided to strengthen the legislation. Remarkably, the Parliament even adopted a proposal the Alliance had put forward to ban all preventative group treatments.

On the 28 January 2022, the new EU rules came into force. On paper, the restrictions are strong: all routine use is banned, preventative use can only occur in individual animals in exceptional cases where risks are high (e.g. when an animal undergoes surgery), and metaphylactic use, a type of group treatment where some of the animals have been diagnosed with illness and all of the animals are treated, is restricted to cases where the risk of disease spread is high and no alternative treatments are available.

Furthermore, the legislation prohibits using antibiotics to compensate for poor hygiene, inadequate animal husbandry or lack of care, or for poor farm management. However, despite the legislation having been agreed in late 2018, there is very little evidence of husbandry changes having been made in the lead up to the rules coming into force last year, and so sadly, there is good reason to think that full compliance will not be achieved in many countries.

UK proposes new laws after much delay

When negotiations on the new EU rules on farm antibiotic use were occurring, between about 2014 and 2018, the UK was still a Member State and played an active role in developing the new legislation. Even after Brexit, the government said in Parliament and in its National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance that it intended to implement the provisions of the legislation, including those on preventative use, in the UK.

Unfortunately, government action was repeatedly delayed, and no new UK rules came into force last year. However, the government has finally announced its proposed new legislation and put it out to consultation. The government wants to adopt many of the new EU rules, but unfortunately not several key aspects.

While preventative use is to be restricted to exceptional cases where there is a high risk of infection, there is to be no outright ban on preventative group treatments. Instead the rules would state that preventative group treatments cannot be “routine or predictable” and a management review whenever they occur. It is unclear who would carry out such a review, how it would be assessed and how it could ensure that preventative group treatment is subsequently avoided.

There are also no specific restrictions on metaphylaxis in the proposed legislation, although the general principle that farm antibiotic use cannot be routine would apply. This does raise concerns that reductions in preventative treatment could be compensated by increased metaphylaxis.

Very disappointingly, the government currently proposes no statutory antibiotic-usage data collection by animal species, preferring instead to rely on voluntary data collection by industry bodies.

The lack of statutory antibiotic-usage data collection in the UK makes it much more difficult for sectors such as the organic sector to collect their own data. One-off data collection projects show that organic farmers are usually very low users of antibiotics, but annual farm-level antibiotic-usage data would help identify husbandry factors which are associated with high or with low antibiotic usage. Organic and non-organic farmers alike could benefit from this kind of information being made publicly available.

Progress is occurring but much more is needed

It is now over 40 years since any new antibiotics have been discovered for many infections like Ecoli or Salmonella. Scientists estimate that in 2019 nearly 5 million deaths a year worldwide were linked with antibiotic resistance, with 1.27 million being directly as a result of it. It is projected that, if we continue with business as usual, by 2050, 10 million people a year will die from antibiotic resistance.

Fortunately, we are seeing signs of real progress. British farm antibiotic use has fallen by about 55% since 2014, and if the new rules on antibiotic usage are adopted and implemented, further reductions should follow.

But much remains to be done. We have still not seen any major improvements to animal husbandry, or any moves away from the kind of intensive-farming practices that are linked with disease and antibiotic use. So it will be important to ensure that if routine farm antibiotic use and using antibiotics to compensate for inadequate husbandry are to be banned, that these rules are actually applied in practice.

Doing so will require a shift towards more extensive systems, such as organic, which are the healthiest and least stressful way of farming animals.


Follow our work to be kept in the loop on progress by signing up to our newsletter.

Alternatively, please consider making a donation to the Soil Association to contribute towards further successes in this area. Thank you.